The Influence of Forensic Audits, Internal Audits, Information Technology, Auditor Attitudes and Professional Skepticism on Fraud Disclosure

Authors

  • Winda Utami Br Siburian Panca Budi Development University
  • Auna Syafitri Panca Budi Development University
  • Rahelsa Octaviana Panca Budi Development University
  • Handriyani Dwilita Panca Budi Development University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonieconomics.v2i1.88

Keywords:

Forensic, Accounting, Internal, Audit, Technology

Abstract

This article examines the influence of Forensic Audit, Internal Audit, Information Technology, Auditor Attitude, and professional skepticism on Fraud Disclosure. The goal is to make a hypothesis about the influence of each variable that will be used in future research. The results of this article are: Forensic Accounting, Internal Audit, Information Technology, Auditor Attitude, and professional skepticism affect Fraud Disclosure.

References

Anggi Sari Tambunan, & Meutia, T. (n.d.). The effect of forensic audit on fraud prevention and disclosure. e-ISSN: 2985-7651; p-ISSN: 2985-6264, 210-218.

Cris Kuntadi, Fitri Isnaini, R. S., & Pramukty, R. (2023). The effect of forensic accounting, investigative audit, independence, and professional skepticism on fraud disclosure. [Journal Name].

Dani Pramesti, S. W., & Kuntadi, C. (2022). Literature review: The effect of forensic accounting, investigative audit, and independence on fraud disclosure. [Journal Name].

Fiqra Saridewi, L., Lannai, D., Bakri, A., Pramukti, A., & Subhan. (2022). The influence of competence, professional skepticism, and auditor experience on fraud disclosure. Center of Economic Student Journal, 5(2), April 2022.

Ike Saphira Mahyuda, Puspita Sari, D. P., & Putra, R. S. (2022). The effect of internal audit and whistleblowing system on fraud disclosure in banking sector companies (Period 2018–2022). [Journal Name]. ISSN: 2614-6754.

Imas Mutikartini Putri, Marta, M., & Machdar, N. M. (2022). The effect of information technology utilization, whistleblowing system, and the role of investigative audit on fraud disclosure. Profit: Journal of Management, Business and Accounting.

Laras Rahmayani, Kamaliah, & Susilatri, C. A. (2014). The influence of auditor ability, auditor professional skepticism, audit techniques, and whistleblowers on the effectiveness of the implementation of investigative audits in the disclosure of fraud. JOM FEKON, 1(2), October 2014.

Mardani, M., Basri, Y. M., & Rasuli, M. (2020). The effect of audit committee, internal audit, and company size on fraud disclosure in banking companies listed on the IDX 2018. Al-Iqtishad Journal, 16(1).

Pujilestari, N. M., & Machdar, N. M. (2024). The influence of forensic accounting, investigative audit, and independence auditors against fraud disclosure. Journal of Economics, Management, Accounting and Business, 2(3), 1-10.

Rahmawati, P., Simorangkir, R., & Ginting, R. (2021). The influence of forensic accounting, professional skepticism, and audit experience on fraud detection. Akunida Journal, 7(2), 1-10.

Rita Anugerah, & Akbar, S. H. (2014). The effect of competence, task complexity, and professional skepticism on audit quality. Journal of Accounting, 2(2), 139-148.

Suzy Noviyanti. (2008). Professional skepticism of auditors in detecting general fraud. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Finance, 5(1), 102-125.

Wahyuadi Pamungkas, & Jaeni. (2022). The influence of forensic accounting, investigative audit, independence, and professional skepticism on fraud disclosure (Study on BPKP Central Java Representative). Scientific Journal of Computerized Accounting, 15(1), 1-11.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-18

How to Cite

Winda Utami Br Siburian, Auna Syafitri, Rahelsa Octaviana, & Handriyani Dwilita. (2025). The Influence of Forensic Audits, Internal Audits, Information Technology, Auditor Attitudes and Professional Skepticism on Fraud Disclosure . Harmoni Economics: International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2(1), 224–236. https://doi.org/10.70062/harmonieconomics.v2i1.88